Which philosophy describes a common misconception of HACCP?

The philosophy conveyed in the first choice reflects a common misconception about HACCP that can hinder food safety and quality management practices. The idea that "if it isn't broken, don't fix it" implies that organizations may become complacent and fail to assess or address potential hazards until an issue arises. This reactive mindset contrasts sharply with the proactive nature of HACCP, which emphasizes the importance of anticipating, identifying, and controlling hazards before they result in safety or quality failures.

HACCP is fundamentally about prevention and continuous monitoring of processes. It requires the establishment of critical control points and regular reviews to ensure that the systems in place keep food safe, rather than waiting for problems to occur. Engaging with potential hazards should be an ongoing process, not something that is only addressed when a malfunction or failure has manifested. By adhering to this misconception, companies risk allowing unnoticed hazards to persist, which can lead to food safety incidents and regulatory non-compliance.

Other philosophies related to HACCP, such as continuous improvement, proper documentation, and the prioritization of risks, reinforce the proactive framework of HACCP by highlighting the importance of constant vigilance, thorough records, and a focus on the most significant potential hazards.